Comments on: Compliance? Me? http://www.bananasontoast.org/2004/05/31/compliance-me/ Just another WordPress weblog Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:07:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Kevin http://www.bananasontoast.org/2004/05/31/compliance-me/comment-page-1/#comment-181 Kevin Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bananasontoast.org/?p=203#comment-181 My web sites seem to be HTML 4 compliant, but for some reason the program I use to validate it doesn't like the fact that if I use the BR tag it says it needs an end tag. Other than that, all pages are fine. My web sites seem to be HTML 4 compliant, but for some reason the program I use to validate it doesn’t like the fact that if I use the BR tag it says it needs an end tag. Other than that, all pages are fine.

]]> By: phalacee http://www.bananasontoast.org/2004/05/31/compliance-me/comment-page-1/#comment-182 phalacee Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bananasontoast.org/?p=203#comment-182 As you so rudely pointed out last night, my site has hundreds of errors, but thats cos I don't follow conventions. It works fine in IE5+ and Mozilla FireBird/Fox 0.7+ ... so who gives a toss how many errors there are? I do plan, however on making it more streamline and compliant ... when I get the time, but with over 9000 lines of code ... I might be better off building a new site ... As you so rudely pointed out last night, my site has hundreds of errors, but thats cos I don’t follow conventions. It works fine in IE5+ and Mozilla FireBird/Fox 0.7+ … so who gives a toss how many errors there are?

I do plan, however on making it more streamline and compliant … when I get the time, but with over 9000 lines of code … I might be better off building a new site …

]]> By: bananasontoast http://www.bananasontoast.org/2004/05/31/compliance-me/comment-page-1/#comment-183 bananasontoast Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bananasontoast.org/?p=203#comment-183 Sorry matie, I wasn't meaning to be rude. Your site would actually become compliant quite quickly if you replaced special characters (which means those spiffy double < and > braces you love to use), put in your doctypes and used utf-8 character encoding. I doubt you'd get anymore than 50 or so errors, which is about how many I had when I decided to fix them all. Sorry matie, I wasn’t meaning to be rude. Your site would actually become compliant quite quickly if you replaced special characters (which means those spiffy double < and > braces you love to use), put in your doctypes and used utf-8 character encoding. I doubt you’d get anymore than 50 or so errors, which is about how many I had when I decided to fix them all.

]]>